Back to Blog
Imagecast voting machine mi5/29/2023 ![]() © press The ruling is a major blow for Dominion's CEOs (pictured) who hoped to keep the report sealed "The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors." ![]() ![]() "We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,” Russell Ramsland Jr., co-founder of Allied Security Operations Group, said in a preliminary report. The data firm that conducted the forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems determined that the machines and software in Michigan showed that they were designed to create fraud and influence election results, the report reveals. The report covers the forensic audit of Dominion's machines in Michigan’s Antrim County - which received national attention after it was discovered that 6,000 votes for President Donald Trump were "flipped" to Democrat Joe Biden due to an "error."ġ3th Circuit Court Judge Kevin Elsenheimer ordered the report's protective order to be lifted on Monday night, allowing the details of the audit to be unsealed and released to the public. But if the results were tampered with in a contest that wasn't checked, that could go undetected.Īssociated Press writer Frank Bajak contributed to this report.© press 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin Elsenheimer released the bombshell audit reportĪ Michigan judge has released the bombshell report on the audit of Dominion Voting Systems, revealing that the machines and their software were "designed" to "create systemic fraud." Rigorous post-election audits could detect fraud because they would be done by hand and would verify that the human-readable portion of the ballot matches the results tallied by scanners. He and many other election security experts have insisted that using hand-marked paper ballots is the most secure method of voting and the only option that allows for meaningful post-election audits. Halderman has long argued that using electronic machines to record voters' selections is dangerous because computers are inherently vulnerable to hacking and thus require multiple safeguards that aren't uniformly followed. The state bought the Dominion system in 2019, but the plaintiffs contend the new system is also insecure. Originally filed in 2017, the lawsuit targeted the outdated voting machines Georgia used at the time. The advisory is based on a report by Halderman, who examined voting equipment used in Georgia as an expert witness engaged by the plaintiffs in a lawsuit that challenges the machines. ![]() "It's gravely concerning that self-serving election officials can muscle their way through CISA to dilute the agency's compelling essential security measure to remove barcode votes from ballots - a needless, severe vulnerability that puts millions of voters' votes at risk," she said.Ī CISA spokesman said the change was not based on complaints from any party and said that when the agency is alerted to potential vulnerabilities, it's common to update an advisory as it works with researchers, vendors and other partners to provide information on mitigation measures.Ĭrane said he believed less than 2.5% of Colorado voters used the Dominion ballot-marking machines in the 2020 general elections. Marilyn Marks, executive director of the Coalition for Good Governance, a plaintiff in the lawsuit that led to Halderman's examination of the machines, said it appears that CISA bent to political pressure to dilute the recommendation. Halderman expressed disappointment in the change, saying it "dramatically weakens" the security that would be provided by the combination of mitigation measures in the advisory in Georgia and other jurisdictions that rely on QR codes for counting votes. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |